Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://docs.prosentient.com.au/prosentientjspui/handle/1/10583
Title: A cross sectional study of how people diagnosed with a bacterial sexually transmitted infection inform their partners.
Authors: Knight, Vickie
Ryder, Nathan
Bourne, Chris
McNulty, Anna
Affiliation: Sydney Sexual Health Centre, South East Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia The Kirby Institute, Wallace Worth Building, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia..
Sexual Health and Blood Borne Virus Unit, Department of Health, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia..
Sydney Sexual Health Centre, South East Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia STI Programs Unit, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of NSW, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia..
Sydney Sexual Health Centre, South East Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia STI Programs Unit, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia..
Issue Date: Dec-2014
Citation: Sexually transmitted infections 2014-12; 90(8): 588-91
Abstract: To investigate the methods used by patients diagnosed with a sexually transmissible infection (STI) to inform their partners during contact tracing. At a large Australian sexual health clinic between March and May 2010, we undertook a retrospective, cross sectional analysis of the methods used by patients diagnosed with a bacterial STI to inform their partners. Of the 172 index patients contacted 1 week after treatment, 163 (95%) chose patient referral, 3 (2%) provider referral and 6 (3%) could not contact any partners. Index patients nominated 1010 sexual partners of whom 494 (49%) were reported as contactable. A total of 447/494 (91%) of these partners were successfully informed; telephone (37%) and face to face (22%) were the most used methods. After multivariate analysis, predictors of using face to face contact methods were age <30 years (AOR: 2.8; 95% CI 1.4 to 5.7), fewer than 2 sexual partners (AOR 3.6; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.6) and speaking a language other than English (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.1; 95% CI 1.3 to 7.2). The single predictor of using interactive contact methods (face to face+telephone) was reporting fewer than 2 sexual partners (AOR 2.7; 95% CI 1.3 to 5.5). People diagnosed with syphilis were significantly less likely to use an interactive contact tracing method (AOR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.67). Most patients diagnosed with a bacterial STI at our sexual health clinic report informing their contactable partners directly either face to face or by telephone. Electronic communications methods were more popular for people with more sexual partners and those with syphilis. Effective contact tracing requires access to a range of methods for patients to inform their partners.
URI: http://docs.prosentient.com.au/prosentientjspui/handle/1/10583
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051482
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: CONTACT TRACING
HEALTH SERV RESEARCH
PARTNER NOTIFICATION
SEXUAL HEALTH
Adult
Australia
Contact Tracing
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Retrospective Studies
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial
Appears in Collections:NT Health digital library

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.