Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://docs.prosentient.com.au/prosentientjspui/handle/1/11197
Title: Investigation into High Barmah Forest Virus Disease Case Numbers Reported in the Northern Territory, Australia in 2012-2013.
Authors: Kurucz, Nina
Markey, Peter
Draper, Anthony
Melville, Lorna
Weir, Richard
Davis, Steven
Warchot, Allan
Boyd, Rowena
Stokeld, Danielle
Affiliation: 1 Medical Entomology, Centre for Disease Control, Northern Territory Department of Health , Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia ..
2 Disease Surveillance, Centre for Disease Control, Northern Territory Department of Health , Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia ..
2 Disease Surveillance, Centre for Disease Control, Northern Territory Department of Health , Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia .. 3 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University , Australia ..
4 Berrimah Veterinary Laboratories , Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia ..
4 Berrimah Veterinary Laboratories , Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia ..
4 Berrimah Veterinary Laboratories , Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia ..
1 Medical Entomology, Centre for Disease Control, Northern Territory Department of Health , Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia ..
2 Disease Surveillance, Centre for Disease Control, Northern Territory Department of Health , Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia ..
5 Flora and Fauna Division , Department of Land Resource Management, Palmerston, Northern Territory, Australia ..
Issue Date: Feb-2016
Citation: Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) 2016-02; 16(2): 110-6
Abstract: Between October 2012 and October 2013, unprecedented high numbers of Barmah Forest virus (BFV) disease cases were reported in the Northern Territory (NT). An investigation was launched by the NT Department of Health in cooperation with the Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries and the Department of Land Resource Management to investigate possible causes for this phenomenon. The investigation included virus isolations from mosquitoes collected in Darwin urban areas, BFV antibody testing in peri-urban small mammals and a human BFV disease case series investigation of recent cases. No BFV was isolated from the 4641 mosquitoes tested, none of the mammals tested positive for BFV antibodies, and the high BFV disease case numbers did not correlate with the relatively low mosquito vector numbers trapped in 2012-2013. It was estimated that up to 89% of the 79 human cases investigated did not have an acute arboviral illness and therefore had tested falsely positive. An Alere PanBio BFV immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test kit is generally used to test for BFV, with the BFV disease case definition based on immunoglobulin M positives only. Other jurisdictions in Australia also reported high numbers of BFV disease cases, with the majority of the cases suspected to be false positives. Therefore, current testing methods need to be revised to reflect the true numbers of BFV disease cases occurring in Australia and to provide correct diagnoses for patients.
URI: http://docs.prosentient.com.au/prosentientjspui/handle/1/11197
DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2015.1801
Type: Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Subjects: Antibodies
Arboviruses
Diagnosis
Mosquitoes
Virology
Alphavirus
Alphavirus Infections
Animals
Antibodies, Viral
Culicidae
False Positive Reactions
Humans
Immunoglobulin M
Insect Vectors
Northern Territory
Public Health
Appears in Collections:NT Health digital library

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.